Aoife Bennett shocked at ‘adversarial’ nature of swine flu court case


The woman at the centre of the swine flu vaccine case, Aoife Bennett, has told of her shock at the “adversarial” nature of the court case which lasted 21 days.

The State is facing legal and other costs estimated at up to €4m following the settlement yesterday of the case taken by Ms Bennett who claimed she developed narcolepsy after being administered with a swine flu vaccine.

Ms Bennett, from Naas, Co Kildare, took a case against the Minister for Health, the HSE, and GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, as well as the Health Products Regulatory Authority.

The settlement, the details of which remain confidential, is without an admission of liability.

She told RTÉ radio’s Today with Sean O’Rourke show that it had been very tough watching her parents being cross-examined before she gave her evidence.

“We weren’t expecting the level of cross-examination, our legal team thought they would take it easy on me, but that wasn’t the case, it was very adversarial.”

She said she had been shocked when her mother was questioned, but because of her condition had been drowsy when her father was in the witness box. Having her parents go first did prepare her in a way, she said.

“But it was tougher watching them being questioned. I wanted to stand up to add in, to help.”

The 21 days in the High Court were “really drawn out,” she said. “I don’t know how we did it. I’m glad that it’s over now, that there’s no more days (in court).”

Ms Bennett said she was satisfied with the outcome as she had not known what to expect. “I just wanted enough support to live my life.”

She added that she hoped other families will not have to go through what she did in court. “It was very draining, I had to put my life on hold. No-fault compensation would be a good thing.

“I don’t know why the Minister for Health has let it go on so long or why the Department of Health let it go to the courts.”

Source link

قالب وردپرس


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here